Instrumentation Questions Part One

Profibus and Profinet are both industrial communication protocols developed by PROFIBUS and PROFINET International (PI). They are widely used for data exchange between various devices and systems in industrial automation applications.

What is Profibus?

Profibus, short for Process Field Bus, is a standardized fieldbus protocol that is commonly used in industrial automation and control applications. It was developed by Siemens and a number of other organizations in the late 1980s and has since become one of the most widely used fieldbus protocols in the world.

It is based on RS-485 physical layer and offers three primary profiles:

1.  Profibus DP (Decentralized Peripherals) for high-speed communication with distributed I/O, sensors, and actuators.
2.  Profibus PA (Process Automation) for intrinsically safe process automation in hazardous areas.
3.  Profibus FMS (Fieldbus Message Specification) for more general-purpose communication.

Profibus uses a master-slave architecture, where a master node, usually a PLC or DCS (distributed control system), controls communication and data exchange with slave nodes, such as sensors and actuators.

What is Profinet?

Profinet, short for Process Field Network, is a more recent fieldbus protocol that was developed by Siemens and other organizations as a successor to Profibus. Profinet was introduced in the early 2000s and is designed to provide high-speed, real-time communication for industrial automation and control applications.

 

It uses standard Ethernet protocols as its foundation, allowing it to offer faster data transfer rates and a more extensive range of features compared to Profibus. Profinet supports various topologies, such as line, tree, star, and ring, allowing greater flexibility in network design.

It also provides support for both time-critical real-time (RT) and isochronous real-time (IRT) communication, which is crucial for applications that require deterministic behavior and low latency, such as motion control and synchronization.

What are the main differences between Profibus and Profinet?!

The main differences between Profibus and Profinet are:

• Data transfer rate: While Profibus supports data transfer rates up to 12 Mbps, Profinet can offer significantly higher speeds, ranging from 100 Mbps to 10 Gbps, thanks to its Ethernet-based technology.
• Bandwidth: Due to the higher data transfer rates, Profinet provides much larger bandwidth than Profibus, allowing it to handle a more extensive number of devices and applications within a single network.
• Network topology: Profibus supports only line and tree topologies which means that all devices are connected to a common cable or bus, due to its master-slave architecture. While Profinet offers more flexibility in network design by using different topologies (line, tree, star, and ring) with devices connected to a central switch or hub. This allows Profinet to provide higher speeds and greater reliability, as each device has its own dedicated connection to the network.
• Cabling: Profibus uses RS-485 cabling, which can be less expensive and easier to install than the Ethernet cabling required for Profinet setups.
• Determinism and real-time capabilities: Profinet offers more robust real-time communication capabilities than Profibus thanks to its support for time-critical RT and isochronous real-time (IRT) communication.
• Integration with other networks: Profinet can be more easily integrated with existing IT infrastructure and other industrial networks since it is based on standard Ethernet protocols. Profibus, on the other hand, may require additional converters or gateways to achieve this level of compatibility.
• Diagnostic and Maintenance Capabilities: Profibus includes a number of diagnostic features that can help users identify and troubleshoot problems on the network. Profinet builds on these features, adding additional diagnostic and maintenance capabilities such as online device replacement and network redundancy.

In summary, both Profibus and Profinet serve important roles in various industrial automation applications. The choice between them will depend on specific application requirements, including data transfer speed, network complexity, real-time communication needs, and integration with other networks in the existing infrastructure.

Edit This Article